Legal Opinion

Wilson v. United States Parole Commission

District Court, D. Kansas

Decided March 13, 1991No. 89-3165-OPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

*184ORDER

ROGERS, District Judge.

This matter comes before the court on a petition for writ of habeas corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. Petitioner, an inmate at the United States Penitentiary, Leavenworth, Kansas, claims (1) the United States Parole Commission (“Commission”) erred in changing the administrative rating assigned to his parole violation conduct from Greatest II to Category Eight and (2) the Commission’s action in granting a presumptive parole date rather than maintaining a reconsideration hearing scheduled for 1992 violates the ex post facto clause of the United States…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Weaver v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. John J. Rodriguez v. United States Parole Commission and Metropolitan Correctional Center, Robert Elsea, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1979
  3. Billiteri v. United States Board of ParoleCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976
  4. Richard L. Dye v. United States Parole Commission, United States of America, and United States Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1977
  5. Elias Nunez-Guardado v. John T. Hadden, and the United States Parole CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1983

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Attorney General Opinion No., Kansas Attorney General Reports1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API