Legal Opinion

City of Muskegon v. County of Muskegon

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 13, 1900PublishedCited by 5 opinions

.Error to Muskegon; Russell, J. Assumpsit to recover uncollected personal State and county taxes paid by plaintiff. From a judgment for plaintiff on verdict directed by the court, defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J.

The various city treasurers of the city of Muskegon paid to the treasurer of Muskegon county the uncollected personal State and county taxes for the years 1883 to 1890, inclusive. The amount of the uncollected personal State and county taxes due from the city of Muskegon for the years 1891 to 1894, inclusive, was deducted by the county treasurer from the delinquent city and school taxes which he had collected during those years, at the settlements had between him and the city treasurer, and receipts were passed between them therefor. The county treasurer paid from the amount so collected the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Westbrook v. MillerMichigan Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Attorney General ex rel. Scott v. GlaserMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Township of Bangor v. Smith Transportation Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1897
  4. City of Muskegon v. SoderbergMichigan Supreme Court · 1897

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Attorney General ex rel. Ruggles v. Buckley & Douglas Lumber Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1911
  2. City of Sault Ste. Marie v. HottenMichigan Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Auditor General v. BoltMichigan Supreme Court · 1900
  4. Board of Trustees Public Schools v. City of HopkinsvilleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1931
  5. County of Ottawa v. City of HollandMichigan Supreme Court · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API