Legal Opinion

City of Muskegon v. Soderberg

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided February 2, 1897PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Certiorari to Muskegon; Russell, J. Mandamus by the city of Muskegon to compel Samuel A. Soderberg, county treasurer, to pay oyer certain real-estate taxes collected by him for the city. From an order granting the writ, respondent brings certiorari.

1Opinion of the CourtLong, C. J.

At the quarter ending April 30, 1896, the respondent, as county treasurer, had in his hands the sum of $3,255.26 for delinquent real-estate taxes collected by him for the year 1895; and on May 6, 1896, he paid over to the city treasurer said amount, less $1,569.18. He claimed the right to retain this amount, for the reason that he had issued his warrant to the city treasurer to collect certain delinquent personal State taxes for the year 1895, amounting to $526.89, delinquent personal county taxes of 1895, of $785.15, delinquent personal county road taxes of 1895, of $257.14. He settled with…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. City of Detroit v. State Commissioner of RevenueMichigan Supreme Court · 1951
  2. City of Muskegon v. County of MuskegonMichigan Supreme Court · 1900
  3. City of Sault Ste. Marie v. HottenMichigan Supreme Court · 1912

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API