Legal Opinion

Heston v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided March 5, 1986No. 85-928PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

484 So.2d 84 (1986)

Mary Dressel HESTON, Appellant,

v.

STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 85-928.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

March 5, 1986.

Jack T. Edmund, Bartow, for appellant.

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Kim W. Munch, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.

GRIMES, Acting Chief Judge.

Appellant contends that there was insufficient evidence to sustain her convictions of aggravated assault and culpable negligence.

There were substantial conflicts in the testimony. Because appellant was convicted, we shall review the evidence in the light most favorable to the state.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Goswick v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1962
  2. Bass v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1970
  3. McCray v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1978
  4. M.R.R. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
  5. M. M. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Killingsworth v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
  2. Heston v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
  3. King v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000
  4. Smith v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API