Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Smith v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided November 14, 1994No. 93-2051Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partBenton, Judge

The testimony on which the majority relies as showing, beyond a reasonable doubt, that appellant Smith had a weapon the night he broke out of the Jackson County jail proves no more than that he pinched the jailer’s neck, using his fingernails. This is one of those rare cases in which an appeals court, asked to review the denial of motions for judgment of acquittal and for a new trial, *127ought to find that evidence to support the verdict simply was not there.

The majority’s scholarly opinion largely misses the point. The cases to do with threats are inapposite. “I’ll kill you,” unlike “Stop or…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Goswick v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1962
  2. Brooks v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1993
  3. McCray v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1978
  4. M.R.R. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
  5. M. M. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API