Legal Opinion

State v. Ole Olsen, Ltd.

New York Supreme Court

Decided November 30, 1973PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMario Pittoni, J.

Plaintiff, the State of New York, claims that defendants Ole Olsen, Ltd., and Richard Grusmark (sometimes called “defendant developers ”) constructed numerous vacation homes in the “Swiss Forest” development adjacent to Sand Pond in Sullivan County, with sewage disposal arrangements that violated the law and that were so offensive and so dangerous to health as to constitute a public nuisance. Thtis, plaintiff contends, defendants Ole Olsen, Ltd., and Richard Grusmark should be directed to correct this nuisance by constructing a central sewage system.

The evidence has established to my…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Di Sabato v. SoffesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1959
  2. In re Jamestown Lodge 1681 Loyal Order of Moose, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1969
  3. Wilks v. New York Telephone Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1926
  4. State v. Town of HuntingtonNew York Supreme Court · 1971
  5. State v. Ole Olsen, Ltd.New York Supreme Court · 1971

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Westwood Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. National Fuel Gas Distribution Corp.District Court, W.D. New York · 1990
  2. United States v. Hooker Chemicals & Plastics Corp.District Court, W.D. New York · 1989
  3. Philadelphia Electric Co. v. Hercules, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API