Legal Opinion

Parham v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided May 25, 2005No. 2D04-1633PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

WHATLEY, Judge.

In this appeal filed pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), we find merit only in appellate counsel’s argument that the trial court erred in denying the motion to correct sentencing error filed pursuant to Florida Rule ' of Criminal Procedure 3.800(b)(2).

The trial court improperly imposed the following discretionary costs without oral pronouncement and citation of authority in the two cases referenced by Parham’s rule 3.800(b)(2) motion: $2.00 for the Criminal Justice Education by Municipalities and Counties pursuant to section…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Reyes v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995
  3. Ubertaccio v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Waller v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API