Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Green

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided March 19, 1990No. 23181Published

1DissentFinney, Justice

I respectfully dissent. The majority opinion holds that the trial court’s failure to excuse venireman William F. Canty was error but not reversible error. In my view, the trial court’s error was reversible. The majority concedes that *361juror Canty’s responses on voir dire indicated that he was racially biased. Defense counsel moved to have Canty excused for cause. The trial court denied the motion, and appellant exercised a peremptory challenge to remove Canty from the jury.

My dissent is addressed to the question of whether the trial court’s refusal to excuse a prospective juror for cause…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Ross v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. Lewis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  4. Pointer v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  5. Gray v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1987

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API