Legal Opinion
Catchpole v. Mark, No. Cv98 0163439 S (Dec. 5, 2001)
Connecticut Superior Court
Decided December 5, 2001No. CV98 0163439 SUnpublished
1Opinion of the Court
[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION
This case was referred to an Attorney Trial Referee (ATR) for a trial on the merits. The matter comes before the court on an objection to the report and recommendations of the ATR dated July 31, 2001. CT Page 16238
Role of the Superior Court
The standard of review the court applies when considering objections to an attorney trial referee's report is clear error. Meadows v. Higgins,249 Conn. 155, 162, (1999); Elgar v. Elgar, 238 Conn. 839, 848-49, (1996). "It is axiomatic that [a] reviewing…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Elgar v. ElgarSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- Meadows v. HigginsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
- National Elevator Industry Pension, Welfare & Educational Funds v. ScrivaniSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- TDS Painting & Restoration, Inc. v. Copper Beech Farm, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1997
- National Elevator Industry Pension, Welfare & Educational Fund v. ScrivaniConnecticut Appellate Court · 1993