State v. Claxton
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HOWARD, Judge.
The issue here is whether the trial court erred in granting a motion to suppress the evidence. Appellee contended below that the search warrant was invalid. The trial court agreed. So do we, and affirm.
On November 7, 1976 the body of Richard Johnson was discovered in Pima County, Arizona. Investigation of the homicide revealed that turquoise jewelry had been taken from the victim’s home. Later in the same month, appellee visited his cousin, Jearol Claxton, who was then living in Hood River, Oregon. Unbeknownst to appellee, Jearol had been working for several years with…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- State v. SardoArizona Supreme Court · 1975
- State v. DuganArizona Supreme Court · 1976
- State v. WintersCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1976
- State v. PayneCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1976
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. FisherArizona Supreme Court · 1984
- State v. PerezArizona Supreme Court · 1984
- State v. BucciniArizona Supreme Court · 1991
- Frimmel v. Hon. sanders/stateCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014
- Channel v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2018
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.