Legal Opinion
Burkart v. Burkart
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided April 27, 1992PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
In an action for a divorce and ancillary relief, the plaintiff husband appeals from (1) an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Lonschein, J.), dated June 25, 1990, which, inter alia, granted the defendant wife’s motion to set aside certain stipulations of settlement, and (2) an order of the same court, dated September 12, 1990, which denied the plaintiff’s motion for reargument or, in the alternative, reformation of the stipulations of settlement.
Ordered that the order dated June 25, 1990, is affirmed, without costs or disbursements; and it is further,
Ordered that the appeal from so…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Bossom v. BossomAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- Cantamessa v. CantamessaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- Weinstock v. WeinstockAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- Schieck v. SchieckAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- Hardenburgh v. HardenburghAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
3Cited by7 opinions
- Koral v. KoralAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- Cordova v. CordovaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Meister v. DavisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- Ruiz v. RiveraAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- Cuffee v. MillerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.