Hardenburgh v. Hardenburgh
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
The plaintiff wife is currently about 68 years old, and the defendant is currently about 70 years old. They were married in 1941. On April-7, 1986, after two meetings with the plaintiff to discuss the terms thereof, the defendant, an engineer who elected to proceed pro se, and the plaintiff, who was represented by counsel, entered into a written stipulation of settlement. Both meetings occurred in the offices of the plaintiff’s attorney and the signed stipulation was subsequently incorporated but not merged in the judgment of divorce. The judgment and stipulation provided, inter alia, (1)…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Christian v. ChristianNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
- Hume v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- Mandel v. LiebmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1951
- In re the Intermediate Accounting of GalassoNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
- Sontag v. SontagAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Wilutis v. WilutisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- Skotnicki v. SkotnickiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- Burkart v. BurkartAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- Cappello v. CappelloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- P.B. v. L.B.New York Supreme Court · 2008
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.