Hillsman v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KEM THOMPSON FROST, Justice.
At issue in this case is the showing necessary to invoke the plain view doctrine for purposes of demonstrating probable cause under the scrutiny of the Fourth Amendment of the United States Constitution and article I, section 9 of the Texas Constitution.
Introduction
In a non-jury trial, the lower court found the appellant, Lawrence Charles Hillsman guilty of possession with intent to deliver cocaine, more than one gram and less than four grams. With the appellant’s conviction enhanced by two prior felonies, the court sentenced him to twenty-five years in…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Guzman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
- California v. Hodari D.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Johnson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1995
- Russell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
- DeLao v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1977
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Chilman v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2000
- Christy Nicole Tibbs v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2008
- Dorothy Lee Pollard v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2007
- Manuel Velazquez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2003
- Ronald Robert Stinson v. State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2001
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.