Legal Opinion

Chicago Title Insurance v. Holt

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided May 16, 1978No. 7721SC371PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MITCHELL, Judge.

The appellant, Hilary H. Holt, assigns as error the trial court’s dismissal of his third-party complaint against the appellees, Blanco and the Professional Association, and contends that his third-party complaint sets forth a valid claim for relief alleging attorney malpractice on the part of the appellees. He contends his complaint states a claim upon which relief could be granted under either a theory of breach of contract or a theory of tort liability for negligence and that his complaint properly alleged each theory in the alternative.

We point out at the outset that…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Savings Bank v. WardSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  2. Williams v. PolgarMichigan Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Harding v. BellOregon Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Matternes v. City of Winston-SalemSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  5. Delta Equipment and Constr. Co. v. Royal Indem. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1966

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Barger v. McCoy Hillard & ParksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1997
  2. United Leasing Corp. v. MillerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
  3. Simon v. ZippersteinOhio Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Nix v. SawyerSuperior Court of Delaware · 1983
  5. Brooks v. ZebreWyoming Supreme Court · 1990

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API