Legal Opinion

Petranovich v. Matanuska Electric Ass'n

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided May 11, 2001No. S-9346PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

The superior court granted summary judgment to Matanuska Electric Association (MEA) in Clayton Petranovich's personal injury action against MEA. Petranovich argues on appeal that the superior court erred in concluding that there was no issue of material fact on the question of MEA's retained control. We review his claim de novo 1 and will affirm if there are no genuine issues of material fact 2 -if no reasonable jurors could disagree on the factual question-and MEA is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. 3 We draw all reasonable inferences in Petranovich's favor. 4

We AFFIRM, for…

3Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Beck v. State, Department of Transportation & Public FacilitiesAlaska Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Moloso v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Howarth v. First National Bank of AnchorageAlaska Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Sloan v. Atlantic Richfield CompanyAlaska Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Alaska Rent-A-Car, Inc. v. Ford Motor CompanyAlaska Supreme Court · 1974

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by2 opinions

  1. Anderson v. PPCT Management Systems, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Jerry Franks, Sr. v. Hilcorp Energy I, L.P.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API