Legal Opinion
Kitmirides v. Middlesex Mutual Assurance Co.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided May 21, 2002No. SC 16615PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
2Per curiam
In this certified appeal, the named plaintiff, Pelagia Kitmirides,1 challenges the conclusion of the Appellate Court affirming the summary judgment of the trial court that she was not entitled to underinsured motorist coverage under the insurance policy issued by the defendant, Middlesex Mutual Assurance Company, to her father-in-law, Efstathios Kitmirides. Kitmirides v. Middlesex Mutual Assurance Co., 65 Conn. App. 729, 730, 783 A.2d 1079 (2001). We affirm the judgment of the Appellate Court on the basis of its opinion.
The facts are undisputed. The plaintiff was a pedestrian who was…
3Cases cited5 opinions
- State v. ButlerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
- Pelagia Kitmirides v. Middlesex Mutual Assurance Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2001
- Biller Associates v. Route 156 Realty Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
- Wood v. AmerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
- Kitmirides v. Middlesex Mutual Assurance Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
4Cited by8 opinions
- True v. RainesKentucky Supreme Court · 2003
- Connecticut Medical Insurance v. KulikowskiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
- Taylor v. MucciSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
- In re Alexander C.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- Garcia v. ITT Hartford InsuranceConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.