Legal Opinion
Edwards v. Demedis
Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
Decided December 22, 1997No. 564, Sept. Term, 1997PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
EYLER, Judge.
The principle issue before us is whether the discovery rule, which determines when a cause of action accrues, requires that a formal notice of deficiency be issued by the Internal Revenue Service in order for a claim based on alleged negligent tax advice to accrue. We hold that it does not.
Facts
The four appellants, Francis Thelen, George Sourlis, George Antonas, and Nicholas DiGiacomo, are retired Baltimore County school teachers. Each was a member of the Maryland State Retirement System (Retirement System), and consequently, a percentage of their gross earnings was paid to the…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Poffenberger v. RisserCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1981
- Franklin v. AlbertMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980
- Ellerin v. Fairfax SavingsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1995
- Ackerman v. Price WaterhouseNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
- Pennwalt Corp. v. NasiosCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1988
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Miller v. Pacific Shore FundingDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2002
- Lumsden v. Design Tech Builders, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2000
- Berringer v. SteeleCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2000
- MacBride v. PishvaianCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
- Hillbroom v. Pricewaterhousecoopers LLPDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2011
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.