Legal Opinion

Robinson v. . Williams

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 11, 1925PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStacy, J.

The demurrer was properly overruled. It is held with us that where there is a misjoinder, both of parties and of causes of action, and a demurrer interposed upon this ground, .the demurrer should be sustained and the action dismissed. Shore v. Holt, 185 N. C., 312; Rose v. Warehouse Co., 182 N. C., 107; Roberts v. Mfg. Co., 181 N. C., 204. But this is not our case. The present action is brought by a number of creditors, who file a creditors’ bill, or a bill in equity, to establish the existence of a partnership between the defendants, to obtain judgments on their respective claims, and to set…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Dawson Bank v. HarrisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1881
  2. Roberts v. Utility Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1921
  3. Hancock Bros. & Co. v. WootenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890
  4. Shore v. . HoltSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
  5. Rose v. Fremont Warehouse & Improvement Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1921

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Citizens National Bank v. Angelo Bros.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
  2. Murchison National Bank v. BroadhurstSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1929
  3. Carswell v. . TalleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
  4. Shuford v. . YarboroughSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1929
  5. Cotten v. Laurel Park Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1928

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API