Legal Opinion

Carl H. Temblador v. Hamburg-American Lines, a Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided October 21, 1966No. 20896_1PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BARNES, Circuit Judge:

This is an appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California, Central Division. Judgment was entered on the verdict and plaintiff appeals. Jurisdiction of the district court was based on diversity of citizenship, 28 U.S.C. § 1332. This court has jurisdiction of the appeal under 28 U.S.C. § 1291.

Appellant was employed by Crescent Wharf and Warehouse Company (hereinafter “Crescent”). Crescent was employed by the appellee to load its ship, the SS Vogtland. In loading the No. 5 hold of the vessel, the first cargo to go in was some bags of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Mitchell v. Trawler Racer, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
  2. United States v. BayerSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  3. Mahnich v. Southern Steamship Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  4. Boudoin v. Lykes Bros. Steamship Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
  5. William Robert Westmoreland v. Memphis Transit CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1962

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Thomas Howard, Jr. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1968
  2. Mitchell v. KeithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
  3. Bell v. Seatrain Lines, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1974
  4. 36 Fair empl.prac.cas. 1443, 36 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 34,952, 17 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 503 David Lee Mitchell v. Larry Keith, David Lucas, Charles Beasley, William Harden, and General Motors CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
  5. Wheat v. R & B Falcon InlandCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API