Legal Opinion

United States ex rel. Greenwald Industrial Products Co. v. Barlows Commercial Construction Co.

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided July 26, 1983No. 82-3447PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CHARLES R. RICHEY, District Judge.

This matter is before the Court on the parties’ cross motions for summary judgment, the oppositions thereto and the entire record herein. Use-plaintiff, Greenwald, has brought suit against Eastern Indemnity Company seeking to obtain payment under a bond provided by Eastern, as surety, under the Miller Act. The Court holds that Greenwald is entitled to such payment because it had an implied contract with the contractor who obtained the bond. The Court will thus grant plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment and deny defendants’ cross motion.

FACTS

Greenwald…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Richardson v. JC Flood CompanyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1963
  2. United States Ex Rel. Greenwald-Supon, Inc. v. Gramercy Contractors, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1977
  3. United States v. Cortelyou & Cole, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1978

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Blosam Contractors, Inc. v. JoyceDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
  2. Chicago Rigging Co. v. Uniroyal Chemical Co., Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1989
  3. Southern Steel Co. v. HOBBS CONST. & DEV., INC.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989
  4. United States v. BARLOWS COMMERCIAL CONST. CO.District Court, District of Columbia · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API