In Re Johnson
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
ROBERTS, Justice.
We are asked, in this case, to review1 the conviction of an attorney for contempt of court based upon remarks *554made to the jury during the closing argument of a criminal trial. Appellant A. Benjamin Johnson represented Larry Howard at Howard’s trial for murder and lesser included offenses. During closing argument, appellant made five statements which are the basis of his contempt conviction:
1. Appellant stated that he “found out the judge and the District Attorney had signals, where the District Attorney and the judge had a signal where when the judge…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Mullaney v. WilburSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Herring v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Mayberry v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Craig v. HarneySupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Nye v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by54 opinions
- Commonwealth v. GarrisonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Commonwealth v. MarconeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- Cipolla v. CipollaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
- In Re CraneSupreme Court of Georgia · 1985
- Matter of CampolongoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.