Cardoza v. Machado
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
MORTON, J.,
pro tern. — This is an action to quiet title to undivided interests in real property together with damages for ouster.
By virtue of a three-year lease signed by the administratrix of the mother’s estate and expiring October 31, 1936, appellant entered into and held exclusive possession of the Isom Ranch. The parties to this action are brothers and sisters, and through the probate proceedings of the said estate each acquired an undivided one-ninth interest in said ranch, except *810Roza Williams, who received two-ninths, thereby all becoming tenants in common of the property. Some of the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Phelan v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Carpentier v. WebsterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1865
- Rego v. PeltCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
- Tevis v. HicksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
3Cited by3 opinions
- Zaslow v. KroenertCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- James Needham v. Roxanne O. Smith Trust 9/15/19 Madelynn Cassin, TrusteeSupreme Court of Vermont · 2025
- Yu v. Liang, Hu and YuSuperior Court of Guam · 2018