Legal Opinion

State v. Hogetvedt

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided March 27, 2001No. CX-00-771PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

R.A. RANDALL, Judge

Appellant William John Hogetvedt was convicted of third-degree assault. Appellant argues that (1) the district court erred by admitting the victim’s out-of-court statements identifying appellant as her assailant under Minn. R. Evid. 803(2) (excited utterance exception) and Minn. R. Evid. 803(24) (residual exception); (2) appellant was denied his due process right to a fair trial because the state’s witnesses volunteered testimony that the court had already ruled inadmissible; and (3) the district court erred by imposing a consecutive sentence without calculating the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  2. State v. CoxSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  3. State v. DarveauxSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  4. State v. DanielsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
  5. State v. ShannonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1998

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
  2. State v. McNeilCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2003
  3. State v. RobinsonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2005
  4. Lanham v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Lanham v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 2005

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API