Legal Opinion

Wilderness Watch v. United States Fish and Wildlife Service

District Court, D. Montana

Decided August 2, 2023No. 9:23-cv-00077Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA MISSOULA DIVISION WILDERNESS WATCH, ALLIANCE CV 23-77-M—-DWM FOR THE WILD ROCKIES, GALLATIN WILDLIFE ASSOCIATION, and YELLOWSTONE TO UINTAS OPINION CONNECTION, and ORDER Plaintiffs, vs. UNITED STATES FISH & WILDLIFE SERVICE, an agency of the U.S. Department of Interior, Defendant, and MONTANA DEPARTMENT OF FISH, WILDLIFE AND PARKS, Defendant-Intervenor. Plaintiffs challenge the United States Fish and Wildlife Service’s (the “Service”) decision to install a permanent pipeline for Arctic grayling in the Red Rock Lakes Wilderness of…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
  2. Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Spokeo, Inc. v. RobinsSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
  4. Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  5. Alliance for Wild Rockies v. CottrellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API