Legal Opinion
RJC Realty Holding Corp. v. Republic Franklin Insurance
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided March 17, 2003PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—In an action for a judgment declaring that the defendants Republic Franklin Insurance Company and Utica National Insurance Group are obligated to defend and indemnify the plaintiff in an underlying action entitled Harrison v Maximus Spa/Salon, pending in the Supreme Court, Nassau County, under Index No. 011145/01, the defendants Republic Franklin Insurance Company and Utica National Insurance Group appeal from (1) an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (McCarty, J.), entered January 24, 2002, which granted the plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment and denied their cross motion for…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- In re AhoNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
- Mount Vernon Fire Insurance v. Creative Housing Ltd.New York Court of Appeals · 1996
- Agoado Realty Corp. v. United International InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 2000
- Board of Education v. Continental InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- Rebell v. Emigrant Savings BankAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- RJC Realty Holding Corp. v. Republic Franklin InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 2004
- Singh v. Allcity InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Ace Fire Underwriters Insurance v. Orange- Ulster Board of Cooperative Educational ServicesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003