Legal Opinion

Holcomb & Hoke Manufacturing Co. v. Gamba

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 23, 1922No. Appeal, No. 13PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Gawthrop, J.,

Plaintiff declared for installments due under a Written order, in form a conditional sale contract, for a popcorn machine, the deferred payments being secured by a promissory note. Both the order and the note were *192signed by defendant' wbo made an initial payment of $200 when the contract was signed and later paid one of the installments. The contract is subject to the approval of plaintiff. It contains in plain type in two places, one being immediately over defendant’s signature, the provision that “no agreement, representation or claim of any kind shall have any force…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Tranter Manufacturing Co. v. BlaneySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1915
  2. Lowry v. RoySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1913
  3. Abrams v. MusgroveSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1849
  4. Outcault Advertising Co. v. RitcheySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1916
  5. Philadelphia & Gulf Steamship Co. v. PechinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1915

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Gross v. Exeter Machine Works, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
  2. Yentis v. MillsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
  3. Pennsylvania Co. for Insurances on Lives v. WallaceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
  4. Meyercord Co. v. Gwilliam Manufacturing Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  5. East Coast Fi. Corp. v. LinckSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1931

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API