Legal Opinion

(PS) Van den Heuvel v. Cardullo

District Court, E.D. California

Decided October 17, 2019No. 2:19-cv-00883Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JOHN MARK VAN DEN HEUVEL No. 2:19-cv-0883 MCE DB PS A.K.A. JEAN MARC, 12 13 Plaintiff, ORDER 14 v. 15 EL DORADO COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEYS, et al., 16 17 Defendants. 18 19 Plaintiff, John Mark Van den Heuvel, is proceeding in this action pro se. This matter was 20 referred to the undersigned in accordance with Local Rule 302(c)(21) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). 21 Pending before the court are plaintiff’s complaint and motion to proceed in forma pauperis 22 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. (ECF Nos. 1 & 6.)…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Heck v. HumphreySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  5. Lopez v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API