Wolf v. Butler

Appeal from Dallas. Tried below before Hon. R. E. Burke. ' 1. To require that tbe intention of one to make bis borne upon tbe lot should be unmistakably shown, imposes a greater burden of proof than tbe law requires. Rev. Stats., art. 1317; Baines v. TJ11man, 71 Texas, 529; Railway v. Bartlett, 81 Texas, 42; Emerson v. Mills, 83 Texas, 385. 2. Tbe purchase of tbe property, with tbe express intention to “use it as tbe place to exercise tbe calling or business of tbe bead of tbe family,” made it a business homestead. Barnes v. White, 53 Texas, 628; Archibald v. Jacobs, 69 Texas, 248; Gardiner…