Legal Opinion
Broughton v. Adams Pontiac Buick GMC Truck, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided April 4, 2008No. 06-6540UnpublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CLAY, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiffs Dorothea and Michael Brough-ton appeal the district court’s decision denying their claims under the Kentucky Consumer Protection Act, KRS § 367.170, and under Kentucky common law, which arose out of them purchase of a new pickup truck. While holding that it had supplemental jurisdiction to hear Plaintiffs’ claims, the district court granted summary judgment to Defendant, holding both that Plaintiffs’ own testimony conflicted with their claim that Defendant inflated an interest rate, and that no other genuine issue of fact existed as to the price of the vehicle.…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- City of Chicago v. International College of SurgeonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Interroyal Corporation, a Delaware Corporation v. Ralph H. Sponseller, and Superior Roll-Forming Company, Inc., an Ohio CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1989
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Corder v. Ford Motor Co.District Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2012
- Kandice Alston and Jai and Jay Cleaning Services, LLC, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. TD Bank, N.A., and John Does 1 to 10District Court, D. New Jersey · 2026