Legal Opinion

W. T. Raleigh Co. v. Barnes

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided May 31, 1926No. 25771PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, C. J.

The appellant was denied a recovery in the court below on the ground that its cause of action was barred by the statute of limitation. This was its second suit on this cause of action against the appellees. The first was begun before the bar of the statute attached, but was dismissed by an order reading as follows:.“This cause came on to be heard on motion to dismiss said cause, the motion is sustained, and cause dismissed without prejudice, with cost on the plaintiff, for which let execution issue.”

The second suit, the one here on appeal, was begun within ■ one year after the dismissal of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Harrison v. Remington Paper Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1905
  2. Hawkins v. Scottish Union & National Ins.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Nevitt v. BaconMississippi Supreme Court · 1856
  4. La Follette Coal, Iron & Railway Co. v. MintonTennessee Supreme Court · 1906
  5. Cole v. FaganMississippi Supreme Court · 1914

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Lincoln Electric Co. v. McLemoreMississippi Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Deposit Guar. Nat. Bank v. RobertsMississippi Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Smith v. Copiah County, MississippiMississippi Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Crawford v. Morris Transp., Inc.Mississippi Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Lee v. ThompsonMississippi Supreme Court · 2003

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API