Legal Opinion

Lincoln Electric Co. v. McLemore

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided December 9, 2010No. 2009-CA-00320-SCTPublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CHANDLER, Justice,

for the Court:

¶ 1. This case involves a welder’s claim of product liability and failure to warn against Lincoln Electric Company (Lin-*834coin) and the ESAB Group, Inc. (ESAB), manufacturers of welding rods (“Defendants”), for exposure to harmful welding fumes that resulted in his eventual diagnosis of manganism, a neurological disease caused by high exposure to manganese. The plaintiff, Stanley McLemore, alleged that he had used the Defendants’ rods, which contained manganese, to weld materials together.

¶ 2. McLemore filed a complaint in the Circuit Court of Copiah County on…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Donald v. Amoco Production Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1999
  2. PPG Architectural Finishes, Inc. v. LoweryMississippi Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Owens-Illinois, Inc. v. EdwardsMississippi Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Price v. ClarkMississippi Supreme Court · 2009
  5. Ellis v. Anderson Tully Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1998

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. American Optical Corporation v. Robert Lee Rankin, Jr.Mississippi Supreme Court · 2017
  2. Phillips 66 Co. v. LoftonMississippi Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Kinsey v. Pangborn Corp.Mississippi Supreme Court · 2011
  4. Knight v. KnightMississippi Supreme Court · 2012
  5. In re Fresenius Granuflo/Naturalyte Dialysate Products Liability LitigationDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2015

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API