Legal Opinion

Sconzo v. EMO Trans, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 17, 2002PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (LaTorella, J.), dated August 10, 2000, as granted that branch of the motion of the defendant EMO Trans, Inc., which was for summary judgment dismissing the causes of action to recover damages under General Municipal Law § 205-e insofar as asserted against it. The appeal brings up for review so much of an order of the same court, dated December 22, 2000, as, upon reargument, adhered to the original determination (see CPLR…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Abbadessa v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  2. Sciangula v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  3. Betterly v. Estate of SilverAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Fahey v. SerotaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  2. Aldrich v. SampierAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  3. Rosabella v. Metropolitan Transportation AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API