Legal Opinion
Sciangula v. City of New York
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided May 26, 1998PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Cusick, J.), dated May 7, 1997, as granted that branch of the defendant’s cross motion which was for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.
Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.
As the defendant correctly contends, assuming arguendo that a violation of Labor Law § 27-a (3) could constitute a valid predicate for a claim pursuant to General Municipal Law § 205-e, the plaintiff has failed as a…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Zanghi v. Niagara Frontier Transportation CommissionNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
- Hartnett v. New York City Transit AuthorityNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
- Jantzen v. Leslie Edelman of New York, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- Dillon v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
3Cited by6 opinions
- Balsamo v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- Williams v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Abbadessa v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Sconzo v. EMO Trans, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- Forster v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.