Legal Opinion

(HC) Bretz v. United States District Court

District Court, E.D. California

Decided May 15, 2020No. 1:20-cv-00663Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DREW PATTERSON BRETZ, Case No. 1:20-cv-00663-JDP 12 Petitioner, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY PETITION SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR 13 v. FAILURE TO EXHAUST CLAIM 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, RESPONSE DUE IN THIRTY DAYS 15 Respondent. ECF No. 1 16 17 Petitioner Drew Patterson Bretz, a state pre-trial detainee without counsel, seeks a writ of 18 habeas corpus under

28 U.S.C. § 2241.1

ECF No. 1. This matter is before us for preliminary 19 review under Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases. Under…

2Cases cited7 opinions

Danny BOYD, Petitioner-Appellant, v. S. Frank THOMPSON, Superintendent of the Oregon State Penitentiary, Respondent-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
Martin Valdez, Jr. v. W. MontgomeryCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
Dock McNeely v. Lou BlanasCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
United States v. U. S. CurrencyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1980
Ronald Ross v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.