Legal Opinion

Jay v. Sweatt

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided January 17, 1911No. 2620PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Action for money had and received; from city court of Ocilla— Judge Wall. January 13, 1910.

1Opinion of the CourtPowell, J.

Sweatt sued Jay for the recovery of $200 which he had paid on the purchase price of certain land bought from Sweatt under a parol executory saie, under which Sweatt had been admitted into possession, and for $30 paid out for the making of *482certain improvements contracted for by Jay and carried forth by Sweatt after the latter had been admitted into possession. It seems that after the parol executory contract had been made, and after Sweatt had been admitted into possession, it was discovered that Jay owned only a half interest in the land. Upon Sweatt’s discovering the fact and upon his…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Lytle v. Scottish American Mortgage Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1905
  2. Blitch v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1895
  3. Leyden v. HickmanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1885
  4. Prichard v. TaborSupreme Court of Georgia · 1898
  5. Richardson v. HarveySupreme Court of Georgia · 1867

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Colonial Lincoln-Mercury Sales, Inc. v. MolinaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1979
  2. Fields v. CornettCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1934
  3. Haygood v. KennedyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1921
  4. Terrell v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API