Legal Opinion

Barnett v. Metropolitan Life Insurance

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 18, 1939PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGlennon, J.

Plaintiff is a policyholder of defendant, a mutual life insurance company. While the amount which he seeks to recover is relatively small, still there are a great many policyholders of the defendant company whose rights to dividends will be governed by the outcome of this case. In our discussion we will deal with what we consider only the essential facts since the submission covers a great many pages of the record.

Plaintiff is the holder of a policy of insurance containing three benefits, as follows: (1) death benefits ($5,000); (2) disability benefits, (a) waiver of the $87.95 annual…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Greeff v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of United StatesNew York Court of Appeals · 1899
  2. Rhine v. New York Life InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1936
  3. Rhine v. New York Life InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1936
  4. Rubin v. Metropolitan Life Insurance CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1938
  5. Rubin v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1937

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Blackburn v. Home Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Harris Trust & Savings Bank v. John Hancock Mutual Life InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1991
  3. Fidelity & Casualty Co. v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Rabouin v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Maynard v. Mutual Life Ins. Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1942

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API