Legal Opinion

Richardson v. Pitts

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided October 15, 1879PublishedCited by 21 opinions

Error to Howard Circuit Court. — IIon. Geo. IT. Burckiiartt, Judge. The circuit court decreed that arr account be had and taken between plaintiffs and defendants, as partners, each party to be held responsible in proportion to stock subscribed to the articles of association.

1Opinion of the CourtHenry, J.

Plaintiffs and defendants attempted to incorporate “The Roanoke Central .Bistrict Mechanical & Agricultural Association,” but failed to file articles of association with the Secretary of State, and, therefore, under the decision, of this court in Hurt v. Salisbury, 55 Mo. 310, the company acquired no corporate existence.. In order to carry on the business of the supposed corporation, plaintiffs, selected for the purpose by their associates, expended, and in their individual capacity became liable, as sureties, for the corporation, for about the sum of $3,600. Judgments .were obtained against…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Abbott v. Omaha Smelting & Refining Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1876
  2. Hurt v. SalisburySupreme Court of Missouri · 1874
  3. Pettis v. AtkinsIllinois Supreme Court · 1871
  4. Burt v. RynexSupreme Court of Missouri · 1871
  5. Dietrich v. FranzSupreme Court of Missouri · 1870

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Sparks v. Dispatch Transfer Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1891
  2. Queen City Furniture & Carpet Co. v. CrawfordSupreme Court of Missouri · 1895
  3. Booth v. ScottSupreme Court of Missouri · 1918
  4. Wendover v. BakerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1894
  5. Darling v. BuddySupreme Court of Missouri · 1927

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API