Legal Opinion
Vives v. VERZINO
New Mexico Court of Appeals
Decided June 30, 2009No. 28,480PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ROBLES, Judge.
{1} This case presents two questions: (1) whether failure to respond to a petition results in admissions to conclusions of law that are binding on the court in subsequent summary judgment proceedings, and (2) whether an individual whose adjudication was withheld after pleading nolo contendere to a sex offense in Florida must register as a sex offender in New Mexico. The district court denied the motion for summary judgment of Thomas Edward Vives (Petitioner) seeking to bind Respondents to the allegations of the complaint and for a ruling as a matter of law that Petitioner…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Reed v. BennettCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2002
- Self v. United Parcel Service, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1998
- Sims v. SimsNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1996
- Key v. Chrysler Motors Corp.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1996
- Crutchfield v. New Mexico Department of Taxation & RevenueNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2004
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- State v. HarrisNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2013
- Valenzuela v. SnyderNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2014
- Kvech v. New Mexico Department of Public SafetyDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2013
- State v. LassiterNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2016
- Weatherford Artificial Lift Systems v. ClarkeNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2021
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.