Legal Opinion

San Jose Ranch Co. v. San Jose Land & Water Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided October 19, 1899No. L.A. No. 491PublishedCited by 20 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. W. H. Clark, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtTemple, J.

—The plaintiffs claim certain water rights by appropriation. They charge that the defendant has wrongfully diverted water to which they are entitled, greatly to their damage, and threatens to continue to do so. They ask for an injunction during the pendency of the action, and that it he made perpetual, and for five thousand dollars damages.

An answer was put in which took issue with the allegations of the complaint and asserted adverse rights in defendant.

Upon these issues the action was tried without a jury, evidence put in on both sides, and the case argued by counsel and submitted for…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Pennoyer v. NeffSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Ex Parte WallSupreme Court of the United States · 1883

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Hasson v. Ford Motor Co.California Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Vallejo & Northern R.R. v. Reed Orchard Co.California Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Shakin v. Board of Medical ExaminersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
  4. People v. O'BrienCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
  5. People v. HillCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API