Legal Opinion

Mori v. Mori

California Supreme Court

Decided September 24, 1915No. S. F. No. 6779PublishedCited by 2 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtSloss, J.

Plaintiff is the mother of the two defendants. She brought this action to set aside a lease executed and delivered by her to them. The complaint was filed and summons issued on July 16, 1910. Summons was not, however, served upon the defendants until May 4, 1912, something over twenty-one months after the issuance of summons. Shortly after the service of summons the defendants moved to dismiss the action for want of prosecution. The motion was granted and judgment of dismissal was entered.

The plaintiff appeals from this judgment, and also from a subsequent order denying her motion to set…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Witter v. PhelpsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Lopez v. LarsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
  2. Watterson v. Hillside Water Co.California Court of Appeal · 1919

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API