Legal Opinion

Kerr v. State

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided May 14, 1928PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDunn, J.

In making the State of Maine to be suable at the instance of James H. Kerr, the Eighty-third Legislature annexed the limitation that decision of the case be by the Law Court on report of the evidence. 1927 Resolves, Chap. 237.

According to familiar canons of construction, the meaning already judicially affixed to the phrase “on report” was carried into the legislative enactment.

So the resolve is construed to contemplate that, without reference to matters of purely technical pleading, this Court shall determine from the reality of the record, that is, from the admissible *144evidence and the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Handy v. BlissMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1910
  2. Hebert v. DeweyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1906
  3. Cook v. FoleyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1907
  4. Norcross v. WymanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1904
  5. Bowers Hydraulic Dredging Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1908

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Nadeau v. StateSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1978
  2. Drake v. SmithSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1978
  3. Brann v. StateSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1981
  4. Allied Structural Steel Co. v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1970
  5. Wilson Contracting Co. v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1966

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API