Legal Opinion

Meaders v. Moore

Texas Supreme Court

Decided October 25, 1939No. 7391PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Judge German

delivered the opinion of the Commission of Appeals, Section A.

Plaintiffs in error were plaintiffs in the district court and we designate them plaintiffs here. Defendant in error Moore and parties holding under him were defendants, and we will designate them as such in this opinion.

The suit, as finally tried, was in the nature of trespass to try title, and plaintiffs sought recovery of an undivided four-fifteenths interest in 80.68 acres of land in Rusk County, which tract appears to have been quite rich in transitory minerals. It will be referred to as eighty acres. „

For the…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Blight's Lessee v. RochesterSupreme Court of the United States · 1822
  2. Watkins v. Lessee of HolmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1842
  3. Willison v. WatkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1830
  4. Robertson v. PickrellSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  5. Elder v. McClaskeyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1895

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Bruni v. VidaurriTexas Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Shell Oil Co., Inc. v. HowthTexas Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Calfee v. DukeTexas Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Evans v. CovingtonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1990
  5. Pinchback v. HocklessTexas Supreme Court · 1942

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API