Legal Opinion

Lanman v. . the Lewiston Railroad Company

New York Court of Appeals

Decided March 5, 1859PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Motion on the part of the appellants for leave to dismiss their appeal on payment of costs.

1Opinion of the Court

Johnson, Ch. J.

The plaintiffs had judgment in the Supreme Court at special term for damages and costs. The defendants appealed, and the court at general term, on that appeal, ordered a new trial, unless the plaintiffs would deduct ■a certain sum from the judgment; in case they consented to the deduction, judgment of affirmance was given as to the residue of the judgment. The plaintiffs did not consent to the deduction, but appealed to this court. In the notice oí appeal they stipulate that, if the order shall be affirmed, the deduction shall be made from the judgment and the residue thereof…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Hitchings v. . Van BruntNew York Court of Appeals · 1868
  2. Hiscock v. . HarrisNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
  3. City of New York v. ScottCivil Court of the City of New York · 1998
  4. Kraus v. Ford Motor Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1977
  5. Hitchings v. . Van BruntNew York Court of Appeals · 1868

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API