Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Hitchings v. . Van Brunt

New York Court of Appeals

Decided June 5, 1868Published

1Concurrence

The agreement upon which this action is brought is one between an attorney and his client, providing for a large compensation upon the success of the former in conducting a cause, where the client was assured, that the case was one which not only stood very strong for him, but in which he must succeed. In considering such a transaction, it may not, perhaps, be necessary to go to the extreme length of some of the cases which hold, that, where a security is thus taken, the absolute presumption of unfairness arises, wherever the relation of counsel and client exists. (Evans v. Ellis, 5 Denio,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Howell v. RansomNew York Court of Chancery · 1845
  2. Evans v. EllisCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1846
  3. Lanman v. . the Lewiston Railroad CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1859

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API