Hitchings v. . Van Brunt
New York Court of Appeals
1Concurrence
The agreement upon which this action is brought is one between an attorney and his client, providing for a large compensation upon the success of the former in conducting a cause, where the client was assured, that the case was one which not only stood very strong for him, but in which he must succeed. In considering such a transaction, it may not, perhaps, be necessary to go to the extreme length of some of the cases which hold, that, where a security is thus taken, the absolute presumption of unfairness arises, wherever the relation of counsel and client exists. (Evans v. Ellis, 5 Denio,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Howell v. RansomNew York Court of Chancery · 1845
- Evans v. EllisCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1846
- Lanman v. . the Lewiston Railroad CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1859