Legal Opinion

Ramsdell v. Ohio Civil Rights Commission

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 5, 1990No. 89-1438PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAlice Robie Resnick, J.

The interpretation of the Ohio Civil Rights Commission’s governing statute and accompanying Administrative Code provisions is at issue in this case. Reading R.C. 4112.06(H) in conjunction with the correlative Administrative Code provisions, the court of appeals found that a petition for judicial review of a commission order must be filed within thirty days of the mailing of the order and that the thirty-day filing period may not be extended by application of the Ohio Rules of Civil Procedure. For the reasons which follow, we affirm the findings of the court of appeals.

Appellant claims that…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Zier v. Bureau of Unemployment CompensationOhio Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Price v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Proctor v. GilesOhio Supreme Court · 1980
  4. City of Cleveland v. Ohio Civil Rights CommissionOhio Court of Appeals · 1988
  5. Gray v. Ohio Civil Rights CommissionOhio Court of Appeals · 1987

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Welsh Development Co. v. Warren County Regional Planning CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Gallant v. Toledo Public SchoolsOhio Court of Appeals · 1992
  3. Foreman v. Lucas County Court of Common PleasOhio Court of Appeals · 2010
  4. Derakhshan v. State Medical Bd., 07ap-261 (10-30-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
  5. MCI Telecommunications Corp. v. Montana Department of Public Service RegulationMontana Supreme Court · 1993

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API