Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Alabama v. King
Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama
1ConcurrenceHolmes, Judge
(concurring specially.)
I concur with the result reached by the majority in this case. I would further note that, although the arbitrary or capricious standard is a narrow standard of review, we will not allow a determination to stand if it is without any reasonable cause, in disregard of the evidence, or with no substantial evidence to support it. See Colonial Fast Freight Lines, Inc. v. United States, 443 F.Supp. 72 (N.D.Ala.1977); East Texas Motor Freight Lines v. United States, 96 F.Supp. 424 (N.D.Tex.1951); Straub v. Department of Public Welfare, 31 Wash.2d 707,198 P.2d 817 (1948).…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- LeFebre v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1984
- Straub v. Department of Public WelfareWashington Supreme Court · 1948
- Waters v. CITY & CTY. OF MONTGOMERY PER. BD.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1986
- East Tex. Motor Freight Lines v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1951
- Colonial Fast Freight Lines, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 1977