Legal Opinion

Lido East Theatre Corp. v. Murphy

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided February 15, 1972No. 72 Civ. 25PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EDWARD WEINFELD, District Judge.

Plaintiff, an exhibitor of motion picture films, which it describes as “sexually oriented adult films,” and which are presumptively protected under the First Amendment of the United States Constitution, commenced this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C., section 1983, for a declaratory judgment that Articles 120, 140 and 690 of the Criminal Procedure Law of New York, relating to arrests and seizures with or without warrants upon a showing of probable cause, are unconstitutional facially and as applied in that they authorize repressive prior restraints through seizure…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Association of Data Processing Service Organizations, Inc. v. CampSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. SAMUELS Et Al. v. MACKELL, DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF QUEENS COUNTY, Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Perez v. LedesmaSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. Barlow v. CollinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1970

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Cine-Com Theatres Eastern States, Inc. v. LordiDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1972
  2. Oldroyd v. KuglerDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1973
  3. 227 Book Center, Inc. v. CoddDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API