Legal Opinion

Baker Mercantile Co. v. Hancock Bros.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided September 13, 1917No. 8697PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Certiorari; from Coffee superior court—Judge Summerall. March 2, 1917.

1Opinion of the CourtGeobge, J.

1. Where an attachment against a non-resident has been sued - out in a justice’s court and executed by service of garnishment only, and no notice has been served as provided in the Civil Code (1910), § 5103, and there has been no bond or appearance and defense, a general judgment against the defendant is void. Parks v. Williams, 137 Ga. 578 (73 S. E. 839), and cases there cited.

2. In such ease a valid judgment against the defendant in attachment is a necessary prerequisite to a final judgment against the garnishee. Fagan v. Jackson, 1 Ga. App. 24 (57 S. E. 1052); Americus Grocery Co. v. Link,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Albright-Pryor Co. v. Pacific Selling Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1906
  2. Fagan v. Jackson & OrmeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
  3. Henry v. Lennox-Haldeman Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1902
  4. Parker-Fain Grocery Co. v. OrrCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
  5. Central of Ga. Rwy. Co. v. Brinson & IngramSupreme Court of Georgia · 1899

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Stouffer Corp. v. HenkelCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1984
  2. Doyle v. United Finance Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1958
  3. Hartsfield Co. v. RayCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1935
  4. Smith v. Georgia Granite Corp.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1938
  5. Farrow v. WhitakerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1938

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API