Legal Opinion

State v. Acosta

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided May 2, 1997No. 16346PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ARMIJO, Judge.

1. Defendant appeals his conviction of aggravated battery with a deadly weapon on five grounds: (1) there was fundamental error in the trial court’s jury instruction for aggravated battery with a deadly weapon because this instruction failed to include an essential element of the offense; (2) there was fundamental error in the trial court’s jury instructions for self-defense and defense of another because these instructions did not clearly place the burden of proof on the State; (3) the failure of Defendant’s trial counsel to tender a jury instruction on the less serious…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Griffith v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. State v. WilsonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1994
  3. State v. OsborneNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1991
  4. State v. OroscoNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1992
  5. State v. ParishNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1994

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. State v. CunninghamNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Olsen v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2003
  3. State v. MascareñasNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2000
  4. State v. MascarenasNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2000
  5. State v. FoxenNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2001

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API