Legal Opinion

McElfresh v. State

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided July 17, 1942PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ADAMS, J.:

This is an appeal from a judgment of conviction against appellant as a dealer in securities under the Securities Act of 1939. The material part of the agreement is as follows:

“Whereas, the said McElfresh Railroad Operating System for Terminal and Yard Operation has been carefully studied by Railroad Officials and Statesmen who have highly recommended the said McElfresh Railroad Operating System for Terminal and Yard Operation as an improvement over the System now employed by the Railroads, and

Whereas, the said party of the first part is desirous of securing funds for organization…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. WhiteakerOregon Supreme Court · 1926
  2. State v. SwensonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
  3. People v. ShaferCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
  4. Weis v. Kundert, Jr.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1927

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Midwest Management Corp. v. StephensSupreme Court of Iowa · 1980
  2. Florida Discount Centers, Inc. v. AntinoriDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1969
  3. Arthur Young & Co. v. Mariner Corp.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994
  4. Conroy v. SchultzNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1963
  5. White v. SolomonNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1986

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API